9 ms·
[WikiLeaks has stated repeatedly that they publish everything they receive.][1] Blaming them for failing to release information from the other side assumes that
by rosalinekarr 9y ago
[WikiLeaks has stated repeatedly that they publish everything they receive.][1] Blaming them for failing to release information from the other side assumes that they have that information to release.
[1]: https://theintercept.com/2017/04/19/intercepted-podcast-julian-assange-speaks-out-as-trumps-cia-director-threatens-to-end-wikileaks/ https://theintercept.com/2017/04/19/intercepted-podcast-juli...
- lsadam0 9y agoEverything? "We do have some information about the republican campaign". http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/293453-assange-wikileaks-trump-info-no-worse-than-him http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/29345...
- nailer 9y agoParent said they publish everything they receive. They didn't receive Republican emails.
- seattle_spring 9y agoand Fox News says they're "fair and balanced." Infowars says they are, "just asking the questions." Breitbart says they are, "the last bastion of free speech." None of the above 3 statements are true, and neither is Wikileaks statement.
- joshgel 9y agoAnd, if some bad actor, say the Russians, are giving them all their info, and they are publishing "everything they receive", does that make them neutral? Or a willing pawn?
- rosalinekarr 9y agoIf they withheld the information that they received in the interest of neutrality, would that be better?