5 ms·
He's not rejecting progress. He explicitly says that C isn't for everything. But he wants real progress: a language with GC, concurrency, etc., not just C-wi
by jafl5272 16y ago
He's not rejecting progress. He explicitly says that C isn't for everything. But he wants real progress: a language with GC, concurrency, etc., not just C-with-classes-plus-etc-etc-etc