9 ms·
Does that not meet the same end? By strengthening their position they can barter for better benefits for you. Even if those benefits aren't precisely the ones y
by YCode 9y ago
Does that not meet the same end? By strengthening their position they can barter for better benefits for you. Even if those benefits aren't precisely the ones you want, that doesn't negate the fact that they are on your collective side.
On the other hand, the employer wants none of that because they want as much power over employees as they can muster.
How does that make them as worse as each other?
It's somewhat ironic that it seems like a lot of people in this thread are basing their talking points on unions off the anti-union propaganda at hand rather than personal experience or evidence.
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]
- dangero 9y agohttps://www.glassdoor.com/Reviews/Teamsters-Reviews-E2999.htm https://www.glassdoor.com/Reviews/Teamsters-Reviews-E2999.ht... Here is some evidence that helps explain Teamsters. It's a lot different to have Teamsters come in than this utopian view of a few workers banning together to protect their interests.
- Apocryphon 9y agoAssuming those reviews are all truthful and accurate, then it sounds like more workers should join the Teamsters and reform them for the better, instead of throwing out the baby with the bathwater.