5 ms·
1. "Only inhabited by ISIS" - Really? Says who? There were no villages or civilians within the kill perimeter? 2. What's the aftermath of a 21,000 pound muniti
by zdean 9y ago
1. "Only inhabited by ISIS" - Really? Says who? There were no villages or civilians within the kill perimeter?
2. What's the aftermath of a 21,000 pound munition on the environment and resources of the region. Do a google search for the impact of bombing in Iraq, Afghanistan, etc on local cancer rates.
Maybe you still don't object...but at least we can be clearer on the true impact of the bombing.
- westbywest 9y agoBesides its concussive pulse, the weapon is designed to draw in air from underground/fortified structures in the blast radius. E.g. asphyxiate people hiding in tunnels. It no doubt will leave a crater, but my understanding is that the crater would be less than that left by a similar quantity of TNT.
- gozur88 9y agoI would think it would be pretty easy to verify the absence of villages within a mile. And this isn't the type of weapon that causes cancer.
- boomboomsubban 9y agoHow would you verify it then? Do you have the coordinates for where the bomb dropped and recent maps of the area? A year ago we said that all ISIL soldiers had been removed from the area, verification seems tricky. You don't think blowing bits of a building in a twenty mile radius would cause cancer?
- AnimalMuppet 9y ago> You don't think blowing bits of a building in a twenty mile radius would cause cancer? No; why would it? You cause cancer by damaging the DNA of cells. A mere explosion isn't going to do that.
- boomboomsubban 9y agoBuildings are made of things like lead and asbestos, blowing small bits of a building over a huge radius seems like a likely hazard. Plus, whatever the hell the bomb is made of.
- AnimalMuppet 9y agoAh, I see. Well, that's kind of true, but it's like saying that earthquakes cause cancer, because when the building collapses in an earthquake, it also spreads things like asbestos into the air. I mean, it's still true, but it's so much a smaller effect than the other problems, it's pretty much ignored.
- newdayrising 9y agoDo you think letting ISIS operate freely in the region is better than the speculative notion that building debris will cause cancer someday? Do you think the US should merely inform the local governments and hope they will do something? Regardless, I agree that the US should never get involved in the Middle East militarily. There is NO way to prevent civilian deaths, there is no way to prevent people on the Left from reducing ALL military action to American imperialism.
- boomboomsubban 9y agoI didn't realize dropping this bomb or doing nothing were the only possible options, the whole 26 day campaign with two wounded US soldiers they did last year led me to believe there may be more options. What reason is there for a war of aggression beyond imperialism?
- gozur88 9y agoI don't think it's reasonable to characterize the war in Afghanistan as "imperialism".
- boomboomsubban 9y agoSo what do you call a war who's aim is to install a friendly government and take over some amount of the nation's sovereignty?
- gozur88 9y agoI suppose I would call it that if that were the aim of the war.
- boomboomsubban 9y agoOur goal was removing the Taliban, and taking the right to police residents of the country, particularly Bin Laden, without the need of jurisprudence. Set up a friendly government, take over sovereign right. What am I missing here?
- zdean 9y agoWhat makes you sure it doesn't cause cancer...because it's not an atomic weapon? https://www.theguardian.com/world/2003/dec/14/iraq.military https://www.theguardian.com/world/2003/dec/14/iraq.military "The amount of DU used during the Iraq war has not been revealed, although some estimate it was more than a thousand tons."
- gozur88 9y agoWhy are you bringing up DU?
- zdean 9y agoDU is used in warheads >> DU releases radiation >>> radiation causes cancer. Therefore, you could link the bombs that use DU to cancer. In this case, maybe they didn't have DU, but there are still other nasty contaminants that come with 22,000 pounds of explosives dropped in a relatively small area (not to mention the 10s of thousands of smaller bombs being dropped throughout that country and other war zones).
- gozur88 9y ago>DU is used in warheads >> DU releases radiation >>> radiation causes cancer. Therefore, you could link the bombs that use DU to cancer. All that is true and totally irrelevant, since DU is used almost exclusively in anti-armor kinetic rounds. This is just a really big firecracker. >In this case, maybe they didn't have DU, but there are still other nasty contaminants that come with 22,000 pounds of explosives dropped in a relatively small area... Are there? Do you have some reason to think that's true?