7 ms·
OK, but why should they? Prioritising one customer over another isn't good business sense, you're likely to lose the less loved customer.
by gydfi 10y ago
OK, but why should they? Prioritising one customer over another isn't good business sense, you're likely to lose the less loved customer.
- deong 10y agoIn this particular case, you don't have a choice. If you run an NRA ad in Everytown's campaign, Everytown is the less-loved customer.
- mattlevan 10y agoWhy is that? Is Everytown's message so shoddy that it can't hold its own against a ten second NRA ad?
- AcerbicZero 10y agoBasically, yes.
- memmcgee 10y agoWhy do you say that?
- dsfyu404ed 10y agoNumbers have been crunched and conclusions have been drawn.
- snsr 10y ago> Basically, yes. Maybe you should visit their site: http://everytown.org/who-we-are/ http://everytown.org/who-we-are/
- deong 10y agoIt makes no difference one way or the other. The idea is that customer A doesn't want their campaign paired with ads from customer B. I don't care whether they're right or wrong in feeling that way -- they clearly do feel that way. So if you do it anyway, you are absolutely making a clear choice that you favor customer B. That's my only point. There's no way to abstain and keep the goodwill of everyone.
- untog 10y agoBecause you're dealing with sensitive subject matter. Many news sites switch off or minimise advertising on controversial stories. There's no reason Snapchat can't do the same.