4 ms·
Ummm... I looked at the account, and it doesn't look like a shill account in the slightest. In this case, I personally came to the comments to say exactly what
by SomeCallMeTim 10y ago
Ummm... I looked at the account, and it doesn't look like a shill account in the slightest.
In this case, I personally came to the comments to say exactly what the top comment said: This is raising the subscriber compliance limit from 100k to 250k. Nothing to see here. No "threat" to net neutrality at all, except if you're trying to sensationalize it.
I'm more worried about net neutrality when it's giant companies like Verizon or Comcast. Not so much about the compliance of smaller companies, who:
1. Aren't big enough fish to cause the kinds of problems with product adoption that most of the net neutrality worst-case scenarios depict.
2. Aren't big enough to cut the deals with larger content suppliers that net neutrality is trying to prevent.
3. Frequently are barely able to survive at those scales, so the extra regulatory burden isn't actually worth cutting into their meager profits.