9 ms·
Another way of saying same. If employees are in your future, focus on revenue per employee (RPE). Napkin math: sub-$100k RPE and your wee company is nominally
by anguslong 16y ago
Another way of saying same. If employees are in your future, focus on revenue per employee (RPE).
Napkin math: sub-$100k RPE and your wee company is nominally profitable after salaries, fixed & variable costs. Greater than $100k per employee, profits scale nicely.
While nice to talk about the Goog's RPE ($1 mil '08), I prefer to "fish" for company ideas a little closer to Earth. For inspiration, Inc 5000 companies with 50 or fewer employees, sorted by revenue:
http://www.inc.com/inc5000/2009/search_results.html?showrank=on&b_rank=1&e_rank=5000&showstate=on&state=all&showname=on&name=Company+Name&showgrowth=on&b_growth=20&e_growth=316000®ion=all&industry=all&showrevenue=on&b_revenue=1000000&e_revenue=6000000000&showyear=on&b_year=2009&e_year=2009&showemployees=on&b_employees=1&e_employees=50&showfounded=on&b_founded=1790&e_founded=2004&submit=Filter+the+List&sort=revenue&order=DESC http://www.inc.com/inc5000/2009/search_results.html?showrank...
- rgrieselhuber 16y agoI agree on RPE, but the data on the Inc. website is highly suspect, however, with regard to number of employees. I did a random sampling of several companies that had tons of revenue with just 1 or 2 employees and checked out their websites and the Inc. data is flat out wrong in many cases.
- wdewind 16y agohttp://www.healthport.com/management_overview.aspx http://www.healthport.com/management_overview.aspx this company is listed as 3 employees on INC., there's 4 in their management section alone...seems INC maybe has PUBLICLY listed employees, and is not counting the chairman...