6 ms·
Cycle-to-cycle accuracy of an atomic clock (then called a timing and frequency standard) is never dominated by the resonance frequency, and you never extract th
by cnvogel 10y ago
Cycle-to-cycle accuracy of an atomic clock (then called a timing and frequency standard) is never dominated by the resonance frequency, and you never extract the timing information from the radio-frequency that interacts with the physics directly.
The reference frequency used externally for timing is the reference oscillator which typically was 5 or 10 MHz, but nowadays tends to be 100 MHz as HF electronics became better.
For an older Caesium clock, a block diagram is explained on this page: http://www.leapsecond.com/museum/hp5062c/theory.htm http://www.leapsecond.com/museum/hp5062c/theory.htm
{a Rb clock is very similar electronically, only you are not looking at count-rates of Cs atoms flying through your spin filter but you are observing the optical attenuation of a rubidium gas, both vary with radio-frequency waves being injected into the package. Also Cs is a primary standard and Rb is very stable - but adjustable and susceptible to extarnal magnetic fields.}
From the reference frequency, a series of synthesizers / multipliers generate the radio frequency that is relevant to the physics process. And this frequency is then modulated slightly (137 Hz label in Figure 5) so that correlation in the physics process from being too high, or too low in resonance frequency, can be observed (Figure 9, you vary between f2 and f1 137 times per second).
A good GPS steered quartz oscillator will use around 100s of loop time-constant, the time constant for the control loop in a caesium clock will be much higher.
- ajross 10y agoI'm not following your ire. I don't understand why you think adding all the detail above is inconsistent with "functionally, all an atomic clock is really doing is counting cycles (and, OK, tracking phase) of a known transition of some isotope or another. You're just describing how.