7 ms·
Why does this need its own thread? (Other than ego-stroking the OP) Seems like any response could be in the main thread or linked from there rather than splitti
by nroach 10y ago
Why does this need its own thread? (Other than ego-stroking the OP) Seems like any response could be in the main thread or linked from there rather than splitting the discussion.
- feyn 10y ago(I'm the author) My bad. No excuses.
- jMyles 10y agoAre we running out of threads? :-) Threads are cheap and this came to my attention more strongly this way than if it had just been a comment. Every piece of prose posted here is, in some way, a response to something. I'm not sure it's "ego-stroking," strictly speaking. What's wrong with giving the author recognition?
- feyn 10y ago(me = author) FWIW, I can totally understand how it could come across as ego stroking. In this particular case I wasn't trying to, but I have been guilty of it in my life. As for recognition, trust me - give it a week and no one will remember my article ever existed. I honestly just wanted to answer ian0's question thoughtfully, and made the best call I could think of.
- etjossem 10y agoBecause this isn't just a response, but a piece of long-form content which stands well on its own. We generally use submissions for those. Comments are a great venue for short-form replies, but not for multi-page analyses of an interesting question.