6 ms·
> Given how shit both R and D party security is... Ummm, since we're now talking about the private email server (still absolutely illegal, regardless of justif
by MicroBerto 10y ago
> Given how shit both R and D party security is...
Ummm, since we're now talking about the private email server (still absolutely illegal, regardless of justification), we're not talking about DNC leaks here, so this has nothing to do with "D" and "R".
That ClintonEmail.com server should have been in the STATE DEPARTMENT behind government firewalls, heavily monitored by our government's cybersecurity division.
> I suspect the private email servers are actually afforded a bit of security by being obscure.
WOW!!! Are you listening to yourself?! That's demonstrably been proven to be completely false (ClintonEmail.com is not exactly a "obscure" domain, BTW) -- and by her team's own admission, as there was hack attempt after hack attempt:
* http://www.judicialwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/JW-v-State-Pagliano-Secret-Service-01441-1.pdf http://www.judicialwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/JW-v...
* http://www.judicialwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/JW-v-State-Abedin-Deposition-01363.pdf http://www.judicialwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/JW-v...
* http://www.judicialwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/JW-v-State-Mills-deposition-01363.pdf http://www.judicialwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/JW-v...
Then, of course, there was this quote:
> Finally, we learned there is a confidence from these sources that her server had been hacked. And that it was a 99% accuracy that it had been hacked by at least five foreign intelligence agencies, and that things had been taken from that.
But, "you suspect".
How about this: I suspect that they setup a private email server to keep out of the reach of FOIA attempts, because of Lord knows what scandals would have been unearthed. Those emails are out there, many of them possibly on the Weiner laptop or elsewhere, and time will tell if there will ever be any justice served for these Federal crimes.
- KirinDave 10y ago> That ClintonEmail.com server should have been in the STATE DEPARTMENT behind government firewalls, heavily monitored by our government's cybersecurity division. Which is a token gesture and we all know it. Most private companies have better cybersecurity than the "STATE DEPARTMENT." > That's demonstrably been proven to be completely false (ClintonEmail.com is not exactly a "obscure" domain, BTW) -- and by her team's own admission, as there was hack attempt after hack attempt: Email servers ... seeing hack attempts via direct and content-driven means? WOW. THAT ONLY HAPPENS TO STATE OFFICIALS! MY EMAILS CERTAINLY HAVE NEVER SEEN MALICIOUS LINKS. > I suspect that they setup a private email server to keep out of the reach of FOIA attempts, because of Lord knows what scandals would have been unearthed. I hope that you extend this righteous anger to Pence and the Trump campaign for doing everything they can to keep campaign planning materials hidden by (curiously) successfully invoking attorney-client privilege.