4 ms·
No idea why you're bringing politics into this. All I said was no evidence has been made public by the government.
by rahrahrah 10y ago
No idea why you're bringing politics into this. All I said was no evidence has been made public by the government.
- meowface 10y agoCorrect, no evidence has been made public by the government (yet). Much of their evidence is probably classified. However, see here for evidence from private sector firms: https://www.reddit.com/r/NeutralPolitics/comments/52uj5c/do_we_have_any_evidence_that_the_recent_political/d814uzj/ https://www.reddit.com/r/NeutralPolitics/comments/52uj5c/do_...
- gaius 10y ago"Its classified, trust us. And Iraq like, totally had WMDs."
- ncallaway 10y ago> All I said was no evidence has been made public by the government Except that's _explicitly_ not what you said. You said: >still no public evidence that Russia leaked the DNC and Podesta's e-mails? Your original claim was that there was _no public evidence_. When that claim was challenged, you pretended your claim was about what evidence was provided by the government.
- rahrahrah 10y agoSorry, my intention wasn't to move the goalposts, I actually misspoke the second time. Obviously I don't care where the evidence comes from. I did mean "no public evidence" and then the parent made it political, somehow. I did read the RPT-APT28 report by FireEye on APT28 (all fifty-something pages, surprise!). It did convince me that APT28 has political motivations. What's the connection between that and DNC/Podesta? I don't know, because there's no public evidence on that (that I know of).