While I don't agree with you, I see where you're coming from and don't think you deserve negative karma for your post. Let me play devil's advocate for a momen

While I don't agree with you, I see where you're coming from and don't think you deserve negative karma for your post. Let me play devil's advocate for a moment: One could perhaps make the analogy to caffeine (as others in this thread already have). Sports and academia alike drink it all the time. This is a drug so generally harmless that we don't even consider it a drug. Who would argue that caffeine gives an unfair advantage? Does it not make sense that a drug with a more pronounced benefit and similarly innocuous side-effects should be accepted?