6 ms·
Historically yes. But I suggest bookmarking this comment and coming back to it in a few years to see how prophetic or absurd it turns out.
by whybroke 10y ago
Historically yes. But I suggest bookmarking this comment and coming back to it in a few years to see how prophetic or absurd it turns out.
- wruza 10y agohttps://xkcd.com/628/ https://xkcd.com/628/
- whybroke 10y agoReally? A cartoon about the Jeane Dixon fallacy is a response? I think you're going to find the next years very surprising indeed. Even now, using tor is de facto grounds for a wiretap[1] And I apologize in advance if my evidence is actually on topic and doesn't have funny pictures. [1]https://techcrunch.com/2016/12/05/section-702-mohamud-appeals-ruling/ https://techcrunch.com/2016/12/05/section-702-mohamud-appeal...
- mSparks 10y agoback in the day, using a bbs was grounds for a wiretap. (The fact bbs were full of phreakers had absolutely nothing to do with it im sure....) so they sit, they listen, then do what exactly? Someone has to read through the material, decipher it, translate it, interpret it. and how exactly do you act on it? https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=3A_VT9YGA10 https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=3A_VT9YGA10