6 ms·
I can make a case against 3: it's even slower than 2.
by vuanotinn 10y ago
I can make a case against 3: it's even slower than 2.
- pja 10y agoYeah, but if you’re programming in Python then speed isn’t exactly high on your language feature priority list is it?
- dom0 10y agoPerformance and choice of language has in most cases no correlation at all.
- ubernostrum 10y ago3.0 was, yes, because some significant new bits weren't yet implemented in C. Python 3.3 caught it back up to, and started to exceed, 2.7 on benchmarks. And the gap is only going to grow as the 3.x series improves and the 2.x series lies stagnant.