Thanks, that page looks like hell, but I recognise a few terms. http://clang.llvm.org/extra/clang-tidy/ http://clang.llvm.org/extra/clang-tidy/ is much more ap

Thanks, that page looks like hell, but I recognise a few terms. http://clang.llvm.org/extra/clang-tidy/ http://clang.llvm.org/extra/clang-tidy/ is much more approachable, and gives a solid overview. The introductory sentence gave me project-naming cancer: > clang-tidy is a clang-based C++ “linter” tool. Then why is it called tidy ??? It appears first on page three of google's search results for "C++ linter" in spite of the fact that anything from LLVM is probably a) current and b) of exceptional quality. A little marketing-mindset would go a long, long way for these kinds of things. Whilst the Ruby community lead by the example of DHH often takes this concept too far, it is inarguably effective.