22 ms·
For a little context, some rough voter totals going back to 2000 (in millions): 2016: 126 2012: 129 2008: 131 2004: 122 2000: 105 While, c
by themckman 10y ago
For a little context, some rough voter totals going back to 2000 (in millions):
2016: 126
2012: 129
2008: 131
2004: 122
2000: 105
While, certainly, there were less votes cast than the last two elections, it doesn't appear to be a record low.
Edit: Sources are Google for 2016 and Wikipedia for the rest.
- AnimalMuppet 10y agoDon't forget to factor in population growth (above 18 years of age) from 2000 to 2016. Is it enough of a factor to make 2016 the record low? I don't know.