6 ms·
First, define "value" ... then refer to your own post on "Should Points-Based Ads etc.". You think it's an interesting idea. I do as well. The poster does.
by NSX2 19y ago
First, define "value" ... then refer to your own post on "Should Points-Based Ads etc.".
You think it's an interesting idea. I do as well. The poster does. As of now, that's it. Yet that's what I'd expect a lot more on Y.
But so far "is this troll trolling has 2 dozen posts" ... "is t.v. good or bad" attracted PG's attention and the second he comments his army of fanboys instantly add 50 more comments along the lines of "I agree with everything Paul Graham says."
Then new readers see the popularity and get sucked in.
So unfortunately, you could look at thinks like you described above, but something tells me you wish the "Should Popularity-based Advertising" etc. post got as much attention as the "Is T.V. good or bad?" post.
Which I doubt it will. I could be wrong. But I think this time tomorrow you, me and the poster will still be discussing it while everyone is rushing off to make sure everyone knows they agree with whatever post PG just made last.
Honestly when I was refered here I thought most posts would be along the line of the one like Popularity-points advertising, etc.
Creative new ideas meeting with technical talent.