6 ms·
Alternative viewpoint: http://slatestarcodex.com/2014/07/17/heartmath-considered-incoherent/ http://slatestarcodex.com/2014/07/17/heartmath-considered-in..., "H
by nhaliday 10y ago
Alternative viewpoint: http://slatestarcodex.com/2014/07/17/heartmath-considered-incoherent/ http://slatestarcodex.com/2014/07/17/heartmath-considered-in..., "HeartMath Considered Incoherent"
Normally I wouldn't attack something that someone else feels is helping (even placebos can be helpful for some people), but this is the top comment.
- qznc 10y agoHeartMath sounds like a good base with a lot of esoteric bullshit thrown on top. Maybe breathing in a consistent rhythm to get a coherent heart rate variability (HRV) is the sole magic behind meditation, HeartMath, etc? Here is a good TEDx talk by Alan Watkins on HRV: https://youtu.be/Q_fFattg8N0 https://youtu.be/Q_fFattg8N0 (there is also a part 1, but part 2 has the good demo)
- cypherpunks01 10y agoThe whole Heartmath thing seems to me like an exotic way to teach and practice consistent slow, regular, deep breathing (which is definitely worthwhile thing to learn!). I believe the "coherent" HRV curve they claim brings all these benefits is simply the effect of respiratory sinus arrythmia (why your heartrate decreases when you breathe in) while breathing at a very regular interval—the HRV curve just happens to be a good indicator of how regularly you're breathing.