7 ms·
Not really. Every country that has weapons development also has export controls. It isn't about believing your government is moral or good. Its about understan
by dkopi 10y ago
Not really. Every country that has weapons development also has export controls.
It isn't about believing your government is moral or good.
Its about understanding that your government is responsible for the safety of citizens, and that your enemies will want to kill you (or at least kill your soldiers).
- syshum 10y ago>>Its about understanding that your government is responsible for the safety of citizens, and that your enemies will want to kill you Governments are about control, not safety. as to the "enemies want to kill you", most that stems from government aggression in the first place, government is the cause, not the effect of that equation
- nitrogen 10y agoThere is a sibling comment that was flagged to death that makes a reasonable point. The word "enemy" is used in political rhetoric as if enemies are a force of nature, like hurricanes or earthquakes. But "enemies" are just people, and there's very little discussion about why those people want to kill those other people, or how their existence is blowback (or even an intended result) from yet another operation against some previous enemy. I would be much happier with US strategy if the discussion always began with metaanalysis of the motivations and origins of a putative enemy, with the focus on social and humanitarian means to prevent the formation of new problems.
- 0xfeba 10y agoThat's too hard. Let's just precision carpet bomb them and let God sort it out. Any problems 20 years from now will be the next incumbent's problem.