6 ms·

Other than the white color, they actually look different to me. That said, I can show you two editors which look completely alike. I hope you feel the same abou

Other than the white color, they actually look different to me. That said, I can show you two editors which look completely alike. I hope you feel the same about them. Imagine if I said: Atom is such a rip off and the sublime guy must be feeling that GitHub is lazy and a thief. I wonder if GitHub compensated the sublime author who is a small indie dev! http://cache.filehippo.com/img/ex/2794__Sublime_text_2_1.png http://cache.filehippo.com/img/ex/2794__Sublime_text_2_1.png http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-9QBldnFnock/U3PgeKnq-SI/AAAAAAAAStk/WJV5ZlxGKvo/s1600/atom-0950.png http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-9QBldnFnock/U3PgeKnq-SI/AAAAAAAASt...

freyir 10y ago
> Imagine if I said: Atom is such a rip off and the sublime guy must be feeling that GitHub is lazy and a thief. Edit: my original comment wasn't very constructive. My issue with the analogy is that Xiaomi openly copies the design of competing products that have gained success, at least in part, due to having differentiated designs. Usually they copy without providing even incremental innovation or product differentiation. In the case of Sublime Text vs. Atom, GitHub developed an editor with a fundamentally different underlying architecture. Github also made Atom open source, which addressed one of the main complaints against Sublime Text. Atom offered obvious and non-trivial product differentiation. Also, Xiaomi specifically targets products that have distinctive designs. Sublime Text's design doesn't look that distinctive. What are the components of the design (excluding configurable parameters like a light/dark theme) that Atom copied? The main similarity I see are the tabs, but neither look distinct from most other tabs (i.e., Chrome browser tabs).
- nullcipher 10y ago
  Parent comment gave screenshots and claimed things are copied. I am also giving two screenshots and telling you that those are copied. What is the point I am missing?
  - leonroy 10y ago
    Looks like Balmuda (original designer of the air purifier) is claiming the same: http://www.pcworld.com/article/2858592/xiaomi-faces-copycat-charge-from-japanese-company-over-new-air-purifier.html http://www.pcworld.com/article/2858592/xiaomi-faces-copycat-...

freyir 10y ago

> Imagine if I said: Atom is such a rip off and the sublime guy must be feeling that GitHub is lazy and a thief. Edit: my original comment wasn't very constructive. My issue with the analogy is that Xiaomi openly copies the design of competing products that have gained success, at least in part, due to having differentiated designs. Usually they copy without providing even incremental innovation or product differentiation. In the case of Sublime Text vs. Atom, GitHub developed an editor with a fundamentally different underlying architecture. Github also made Atom open source, which addressed one of the main complaints against Sublime Text. Atom offered obvious and non-trivial product differentiation. Also, Xiaomi specifically targets products that have distinctive designs. Sublime Text's design doesn't look that distinctive. What are the components of the design (excluding configurable parameters like a light/dark theme) that Atom copied? The main similarity I see are the tabs, but neither look distinct from most other tabs (i.e., Chrome browser tabs).

nullcipher 10y ago
Parent comment gave screenshots and claimed things are copied. I am also giving two screenshots and telling you that those are copied. What is the point I am missing?
- leonroy 10y ago
  Looks like Balmuda (original designer of the air purifier) is claiming the same: http://www.pcworld.com/article/2858592/xiaomi-faces-copycat-charge-from-japanese-company-over-new-air-purifier.html http://www.pcworld.com/article/2858592/xiaomi-faces-copycat-...