I remember Reuters for years refused to use the term "terrorist(s)" because "one man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter" (that's how I remember it), c

I remember Reuters for years refused to use the term "terrorist(s)" because "one man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter" (that's how I remember it), current guidelines see [1] The same applies here, is a violent political organization fighting an authoritarian regime by means of terrorist attacks an "extremist organization" worth blocking, or people fighting for freedom? A good recent example for how hard it can be to distinguish is what happened in Egypt with the Muslim brotherhood [2] This will just reinforce the sense of people with unpopular opinions and populist movements that they are being discriminated against because of political correctness [3] [1] http://handbook.reuters.com/?title=T#terrorism.2C_terrorist http://handbook.reuters.com/?title=T#terrorism.2C_terrorist [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muslim_Brotherhood#2011_revolution_and_after https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muslim_Brotherhood#2011_revolu... (try to tell me who is the bad guy and who is the good guy at any given point in that period? It isn't that simple) [3] http://europe.newsweek.com/college-campus-free-speech-thought-police-463536 http://europe.newsweek.com/college-campus-free-speech-though...