5 ms·
Interesting note about DMARC, but still, if you're concerned about breaking forwarding for your domain, then why bother using spf at all? I still don't see the
by slasaus 10y ago
Interesting note about DMARC, but still, if you're concerned about breaking forwarding for your domain, then why bother using spf at all? I still don't see the benefit of setting up ~all rules.
- medmunds 10y agoI believe that DMARC requires SPF. Since I want DMARC, I need to provide a compatible SPF, which means ~all. (And I do want to implement DMARC. Not so much to improve deliverability of my own email, but rather to prevent delivery of malicious email pretending to be from my domain.)
- slasaus 10y agoOk, just wondering, would "v=spf1 ?all" be the same in that case? I.e. a neutral spf policy?