4 ms·
My point was we shouldn't have to wait for security checks at all. There are many other high-human density targets for terrorism (buses, trains, buildings, etc.
by xanadohnt 10y ago
My point was we shouldn't have to wait for security checks at all. There are many other high-human density targets for terrorism (buses, trains, buildings, etc.) none of which require security checks. Why are airports / flying any different? Fear mongering by capitalistic stake holders is my opinion. Granted, I'm a jaded American who has to experience the joke that is the TSA. And I haven't experienced Geneva yet (would love to), but 20m is much happier than your average US airport.
- wrs 10y agoIronically, the security line is a high human-density target.
- beat 10y agoIndeed. It would be easy to bomb a high-density waiting line at airport security. You could put quite a large bomb in a suitcase and just wheel it in!
- duderific 10y agoIt's (sort of) already happened - [1] 1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2013_Los_Angeles_International_Airport_shooting https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2013_Los_Angeles_International...
- CPLX 10y ago> There are many other high-human density targets for terrorism (buses, trains, buildings, etc.) none of which require security checks. Why are airports / flying any different? Because airplanes are giant 600mph flying bombs that can destroy large portions of major urban centers. I am as dismayed by the disaster that is the TSA as you or anyone, but let's not totally lose sight of the plot here.
- xanadohnt 10y agoThere must be 1000s of places along train tracks in the US alone where a strategically-placed derailing device[1] could wreak the same, if not more, terror. I'm unconvinced planes pose a greater risk to life loss and that is the point IMO. 1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Derail https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Derail