Although cryptic, I'd say that gcc's error messages are manageable. I'd hold other factors, such as performance of compiled code - across platforms - to be more

Although cryptic, I'd say that gcc's error messages are manageable. I'd hold other factors, such as performance of compiled code - across platforms - to be more important. Alternatively, they could improve on the C++ template error reporting (when they get around to taking C++ support beyond alpha) and that may be enough to sell me. a quick search yields http://clang.llvm.org/performance.html http://clang.llvm.org/performance.html (favourable, but somewhat skewed results). http://forums.cocoaforge.com/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=21016 http://forums.cocoaforge.com/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=21016 indicates improved compile times, but it's purely anecdotal. That said, does anyone else have any experience moving a performance-centric or cross platform project to clang?