5 ms·
You should read my reply again (or maybe for the first time) and comprehend. I did not say nor imply that I think Erlang's processes are OS processes. Sorry for
by ryah 17y ago
You should read my reply again (or maybe for the first time) and comprehend. I did not say nor imply that I think Erlang's processes are OS processes. Sorry for not using quotes ('process') if that's what has confused you so deeply.
- jerf 17y agoYou can hardly expect me to read your mind on that point when you bury it in so many other wrong ideas about Erlang, which I note you do not challenge.