6 ms·
I think haircuts are a buyer beware situation. I trust the average person to give safe haircuts 100/100 times. If the hairdresser is noticeably disturbed or d
by tanker 10y ago
I think haircuts are a buyer beware situation.
I trust the average person to give safe haircuts 100/100 times.
If the hairdresser is noticeably disturbed or drugged, I'll be moving on. I can leave at any point in the process if I feel I am in danger.
Out of curiosity, I searched for haircut related deaths and they were all customers killing the hairdresser because they were upset about how they looked. Based on the actual danger, I would suggest licensing someone to receive a haircut may be the more effective method of increasing haircut safety.
- jdmichal 10y agoYou're basically arguing that incidents don't occur when pretty much everyone practicing professionally is licensed. Sounds like the desired end state to me.
- saint_fiasco 10y agoI've never heard about any hairdresser related incidents in my third-world homeland either. The professional licensing leads to the same end state as a bear-repelling rock.
- jdmichal 10y agoI've never heard of an actual bear attack either. But I still know that interacting with wild bears is a potentially dangerous situation. And I will certainly want that bear-repelling rock if there's a bear looking at me with murderous intent.
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]