6 ms·
In this case yes, because they are influencers of the community and were not being responsible in ensuring the proof was rigorous enough
by machinelearning 10y ago
In this case yes, because they are influencers of the community and were not being responsible in ensuring the proof was rigorous enough
- TillE 10y agoGavin said that he expected Wright to immediately post public proof equivalent to what he'd seen in private. When that didn't happen, he started expressing doubts. I don't think he ever intended his post alone to be treated as authoritative proof. Yeah he made a mistake. But smart, even skeptical people get conned into making those kind of mistakes all the time. In the end, it's a lot of drama with no real harm done.