5 ms·

I use nethogs myself but it's not being placed on repos/ppa lately :( http://askubuntu.com/questions/726601/nethogs-%E2%86%92-creating-socket-failed-while-estab

by lsv1 10y ago

I use nethogs myself but it's not being placed on repos/ppa lately :( http://askubuntu.com/questions/726601/nethogs-%E2%86%92-creating-socket-failed-while-establishing-local-ip-are-you-root http://askubuntu.com/questions/726601/nethogs-%E2%86%92-crea...

keenerd 10y ago
Hogwatch uses Nethogs too: "Hogwatch uses a light python webserver(bottle) feeding nethogs trace mode output to the frontend (Vue.js) using websockets." I'm not sure why a straightforward graphing project is getting so many votes.
- ethbro 10y ago
  Because it keeps other people from having to write a straightforward graphing project that does the same thing? Utility isn't always linked to complexity.
hvis 10y ago
When you upgrade to Xenial, nethogs 0.8.1 is there in the universe repo. Works fine here.
- pmontra 10y ago
  hogswatch needs nethogs 0.8.2+. I'll try to build it from source. Edit: built from source but stuck with other people in the installation of hogswatch https://github.com/akshayKMR/hogwatch/issues/3 https://github.com/akshayKMR/hogwatch/issues/3
  - hvis 10y ago
    I haven't tried hogswatch; judging by the screenshots, it doesn't bring anything more, information-wise, than what's already present in nethogs' terminal UI. But 0.8.1 fixes the problem described on the askubuntu page the grand-grandparent linked to.
bostik 10y ago
My current tool of choice for on-demand console traffic monitoring is tcptrack.[0] Uses libpcap so accepts the same filtering syntax as tcpdump. It can be pretty CPU intensive, so I would recommend against running it on production perimeter systems. Also, the 2 second default retention period is a bit short. But all in all very handy. 0: https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/tcptrack https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/tcptrack
- lsv1 10y ago
  Thanks, I'll give this a try.

5 ms·

I use nethogs myself but it's not being placed on repos/ppa lately :( http://askubuntu.com/questions/726601/nethogs-%E2%86%92-creating-socket-failed-while-estab

by lsv1 10y ago

keenerd 10y ago
Hogwatch uses Nethogs too: "Hogwatch uses a light python webserver(bottle) feeding nethogs trace mode output to the frontend (Vue.js) using websockets." I'm not sure why a straightforward graphing project is getting so many votes.
- ethbro 10y ago
  Because it keeps other people from having to write a straightforward graphing project that does the same thing? Utility isn't always linked to complexity.
hvis 10y ago
When you upgrade to Xenial, nethogs 0.8.1 is there in the universe repo. Works fine here.
- pmontra 10y ago
  hogswatch needs nethogs 0.8.2+. I'll try to build it from source. Edit: built from source but stuck with other people in the installation of hogswatch https://github.com/akshayKMR/hogwatch/issues/3 https://github.com/akshayKMR/hogwatch/issues/3
  - hvis 10y ago
    I haven't tried hogswatch; judging by the screenshots, it doesn't bring anything more, information-wise, than what's already present in nethogs' terminal UI. But 0.8.1 fixes the problem described on the askubuntu page the grand-grandparent linked to.
bostik 10y ago
My current tool of choice for on-demand console traffic monitoring is tcptrack.[0] Uses libpcap so accepts the same filtering syntax as tcpdump. It can be pretty CPU intensive, so I would recommend against running it on production perimeter systems. Also, the 2 second default retention period is a bit short. But all in all very handy. 0: https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/tcptrack https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/tcptrack
- lsv1 10y ago
  Thanks, I'll give this a try.