5 ms·
https://grafana.wikimedia.org/dashboard/db/varnish-http-errors https://grafana.wikimedia.org/dashboard/db/varnish-http-erro... (and grafana.wikimedia.org in gen
by yuvipanda 10y ago
https://grafana.wikimedia.org/dashboard/db/varnish-http-errors https://grafana.wikimedia.org/dashboard/db/varnish-http-erro... (and grafana.wikimedia.org in general) have more stats. It stated '13.38 Million req/min), which I think is ~230,000 req/s
- jsmthrowaway 10y agoAh. So my hunch was that the published number was what is making it through cache, and that's where my estimate comes from too. That sounds about what I'd expect for the cached side. Nice find!
- _joe 10y agoThe total number of requests that get through the cache to the application layer can be seen here https://ganglia.wikimedia.org/latest/stacked.php?m=ap_rps&c=Application%20servers%20eqiad&r=week&st=1461478823&host_regex= https://ganglia.wikimedia.org/latest/stacked.php?m=ap_rps&c=... which you can see is not showing any substantial increase due to the passing of Prince. The big hole of two days that ends just before the news broke is due to wikimedia switching traffic to a second datacenter for two days, see http://blog.wikimedia.org/2016/04/18/wikimedia-server-switch/ http://blog.wikimedia.org/2016/04/18/wikimedia-server-switch...