5 ms·
My fairly crude theory is that those sites have slightly broader and thus less tech-savvy userbases, so searches might represent ingrained ways of accessing the
by JimmyM 10y ago
My fairly crude theory is that those sites have slightly broader and thus less tech-savvy userbases, so searches might represent ingrained ways of accessing the site more than they would for Reddit or Tumblr.
As even the least-tech-savvy becomes more aware of faster ways of accessing the websites, and browser software starts to pre-empt user intention more and more, this kind of convoluted search starts to drop off.
Not sure if that theory holds water, or is in any way necessary.
- Nagyman 10y agoI agree with your theory to an extent, however: > As even the least-tech-savvy becomes more aware of faster ways of accessing the websites I'm not sure that happens. From observation, people tend to stick to the first way they figured out how to do something on their computer. Searching for "Facebook" from Google is very standard practice. Further, browsers _encourage_ search over direct address input. I've tried to show people many times how to visit sites directly... it doesn't help them so they understandably ignore the advice.
- grandalf 10y agoAlso, Google stopped indexing Twitter around the time Twitter started to decline, but Facebook still comes up first for many name searches.