6 ms·
That depends on your view. I'd much rather something more modern (YAWS, Ngix, Mongrel) be the most popular.
by ThinkWriteMute 17y ago
That depends on your view. I'd much rather something more modern (YAWS, Ngix, Mongrel) be the most popular.
- yesimahuman 17y agoHere is some good insight into why Apache is better for a lot of implementations: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/195534/in-production-apache-modwsgi-or-nginx-modwsgi http://stackoverflow.com/questions/195534/in-production-apac...
- yesimahuman 17y agoSpecifically this link: http://blog.dscpl.com.au/2009/05/blocking-requests-and-nginx-version-of.html http://blog.dscpl.com.au/2009/05/blocking-requests-and-nginx...
- paraschopra 17y agoOh, I am not sure I understand it deeply but is it just applicable to mod_wsgi or does FastCGI or PHP-FPM suffer from a similar behavior? (Apologies if the question is naive or dumb)
- chrischen 17y agoDon't know about that specific problem, but mod_php is faster than php-fpm or fastcgi: http://blog.a2o.si/2009/06/24/apache-mod_php-compared-to-nginx-php-fpm/ http://blog.a2o.si/2009/06/24/apache-mod_php-compared-to-ngi...
- chrischen 17y agoI know nginx doesn't completely implement HTTP 1.1. To be technical, it doesn't support chunked transfer encoding for request bodies. So we still need feature-ful web servers (well at least I do).