That does seem to be the argument. It's a slippery slope fallacy. There is no reason to assume this sets any sort of precedent. And it should be pointed out th

That does seem to be the argument. It's a slippery slope fallacy. There is no reason to assume this sets any sort of precedent. And it should be pointed out that point A never existed. Apple's device is not fully secure, or they wouldn't be capable of complying with the FBI.