5 ms·
> Force carrying particles in general don't have mass. Massless particles don't have energy. Massless and energyless particles have no speed. I have no interes
by purpled_haze 11y ago
> Force carrying particles in general don't have mass.
Massless particles don't have energy. Massless and energyless particles have no speed. I have no interest in massless and energyless particles that stand still.
- cyphar 11y agoPhotons are massless particles that have energy. All massless particles travel at the speed of light.
- purpled_haze 11y agoProtons are said to be massless, but a proton may have mass that is so small that we cannot measure it easily. We can't currently say with 100% certainty that it is massless- only that it is at most very, very small: < 1×10−18 eV/c2
- Jweb_Guru 11y agoWhat? Protons most definitely have mass.
- dwaxe 11y agoThey obviously meant photons
- purpled_haze 11y agoYes, fingers kept typing wrong word.
- deciplex 11y agoFirst, I'll assume you meant 'photon'. With that in mind, is it your assertion that if photons have no mass, they necessarily possess no energy? Because if so, and assuming you have some reason for believing this i.e. you can prove it, I would urge you to forward these findings to a physics journal of your choice posthaste, as this basically represents a total refutation of much of physics of the last century or so. You will easily win a Nobel Prize.
- deciplex 11y agoThis is an awfully confident-sounding post for being so off base.
- deleted 11y ago[deleted]
- UlyssesSKrunk 11y agoI want some of what you're smoking.
- sound_of_basker 11y agoE = h*nu