Since there still seems to be a debate about exactly what weakness was exploited, that conclusion is unwarranted. For that matter, a truly thorough cracker (wi

Since there still seems to be a debate about exactly what weakness was exploited, that conclusion is unwarranted. For that matter, a truly thorough cracker (with more time than constructiveness) might go to the trouble to identify more than one weak point, hold some in reserve, and exploit them sequentially over time - either to offer a more depressing experience to the site owner or to discredit the site's technical team [taking advantage of people willing to jump to your conclusion :) ]