8 ms·
He has the same 'expert blindspot' as so many others when it comes to learning and pedagogy. If you show this book or go through this book with a true novice,
by edtechdev 11y ago
He has the same 'expert blindspot' as so many others when it comes to learning and pedagogy.
If you show this book or go through this book with a true novice, like a child or complete non-programmer (no one has 'zero' knowledge like he says), this would turn them off programming for a long time.
To hook people in, to give them an actual /reason/ to learn programming, you need to show them how programming can be used to do something fun or useful. For example making a little game, or making something to help with a spreadsheet or so forth.
Instead, he waits until the very end of the book to start thinking about using the language to create something useful:
"OK, so now everything is ready to talk about deploying things to the web. And at this point, people will be able to start creating useful, practical pieces of software that they can share with the world."
Start with how to make a simple web page, or a simple game that others can play, etc. Don't end with that. Make it easier for people to use your tool to make games or practical applications.
Then again, as others have pointed out, the fact that this tool is proprietary though makes it a non-starter for novices, anyway, in my opinion.
- kesselvon 11y agoThat already exists using Wolfram tech: http://www.wolfram.com/programming-lab/ http://www.wolfram.com/programming-lab/