I notice some people above saying that it could be a mistake. I think it could be. But it is less likely that it was. I say that because Pachauri had been sayi

I notice some people above saying that it could be a mistake. I think it could be. But it is less likely that it was. I say that because Pachauri had been saying for a year that the Indian government was being arrogant by not agreeing to their "findings". And he rejected research such as this : http://moef.nic.in/downloads/public-information/MoEF%20Discussion%20Paper%20_him.pdf http://moef.nic.in/downloads/public-information/MoEF%20Discu... Compiled by people who have 3-4 decades of experience in Himalayan glaciology. Please do check that review paper. It is not easy to find.