7 ms·
>>Personally, I would not want anyone with criminal records in my neighborhood/private property. There are plenty of good people who get labeled criminals and
by smtddr 11y ago
>>Personally, I would not want anyone with criminal records in my neighborhood/private property.
There are plenty of good people who get labeled criminals and plenty of people would really should have a criminal record but avoided it. Don't make the mistake of aligning morals/ethics with the law. What's legal often isn't morally sound, what's illegal doesn't make sense half the time until you follow the money.
- zo1 11y ago>"Don't make the mistake of aligning morals/ethics with the law. " I'm an anarcho-capitalist, so I don't align my morals/ethics with the law. All I'm implying is that being a convicted criminal, to some extent, is an undesirable property of individuals you want near your safe area. >"There are plenty of good people who get labeled criminals and plenty of people would really should have a criminal record but avoided it." You have to assume the process by which they were convicted was reasonable for the suggested idea. If that's not the case then of course you shouldn't give too-much weight to being convicted. Again, it's up to the individuals how they wish to restrict access to their private property. Some will take this as a good signal for exclusion, others (like you, perhaps) will not.