7 ms·
In general we've found that companies are using the icon rel for favicons (16x16 icons) which don't do a good job of representing a company logo at larger sizes
by maccman 11y ago
In general we've found that companies are using the icon rel for favicons (16x16 icons) which don't do a good job of representing a company logo at larger sizes.
- callahad 11y agoIf you're looking for positive intent, maybe propose that sites explicitly set the sizes attribute? Either way, you're asking folks to modify their <head>. Embracing the icon rel avoids duplicating effort.
- maccman 11y agoYes good point! We'll make sure that we pick up icon rels that point to pngs or jpgs (not icos) too.