20 ms·
Sigh, yet another example of hot shot teams using MongoDB just because it's new and sexy. Existing, established tools such as Oracle and Postgres would have off
by vostro_mf 11y ago
Sigh, yet another example of hot shot teams using MongoDB just because it's new and sexy. Existing, established tools such as Oracle and Postgres would have offered lots of ways of avoiding such a problem.
- pbreit 11y agoWas it mentioned anywhere this occurred in their mongo environment?
- deleted 11y ago[deleted]
- rjbrock 11y agoI am a huge fan of postgres, but removing an index on postgres like this (especially if it is the primary means of querying a large table) would have the same effects. This is just a failure of the tool that executes indexing operations, and not of the db itself
- cookiecaper 11y agoAlthough it's probably not directly relevant to this problem, I agree with you. MongoDB is the new MySQL; early on the scene and sexy, but at a real cost. There are other solutions doing the same things much better, and your life will be easier if you do your research before jumping into the sexy solution. Companies should think carefully before introducing MongoDB (or any immature project) into critical production stacks.
- dang 11y agoWe detached this subthread from https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10366459 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10366459 and marked it off-topic.