And while your're at it, I suggest taking the Bayesian approach for the criterion of a scientific method, where falsification is a particular (and simplified) c

And while your're at it, I suggest taking the Bayesian approach for the criterion of a scientific method, where falsification is a particular (and simplified) case of Bayesian reasoning. A great introduction may be found at [0], if one is already well versed in Bayes theorom, then an excerpt [1] should be enough. [0]: http://www.yudkowsky.net/rational/bayes http://www.yudkowsky.net/rational/bayes [1]: http://www.soest.hawaii.edu/oceanography/researchers/francois/RESEARCH/RESEARCH_NOTES/SCIENTIFIC_NOTES/Popper-as-an-exception-to-Bayes.html http://www.soest.hawaii.edu/oceanography/researchers/francoi...