6 ms·

That being fugly and having absolutely no talent whatsoever does not mean one can't be a commercial success?

• wendroid 17y ago
  Are you really sure that's what you mean? If this is what you call talentless http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j3pUItwVxyc http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j3pUItwVxyc And let me tell you, musical talent alone will not get you very far in showbusiness.
  • TriinT 17y ago
    Either you're deaf, or your standards are very low. Sorry to burst your bubble, but I personally know tens of musicians, and most aren't even that talented, who make Lady GaGa look like the proto-amateur she is. Her talent is to sell, not to make music. Last but not least: she's ugly as hell. But then, so was Britney Spears 10 years ago, and that didn't stop her from becoming "successful".
    • wendroid 17y ago
      We'll have to agreee to disagree then. I'm not so shallow on the appearance part, that's just your sexism.
      • TriinT 17y ago
        You are confused: shallow is one thing, sexist is another. "...musical talent alone will not get you very far in showbusiness" Your words, not mine. So, if musical talent is not what gets you ahead in showbiz, what is it then? Surprise, surprise... it's good looks! So, I am a sexist for stating the obvious. That's laughable.
      • deleted 17y ago
        [deleted]