5 ms·
The article answers the question with a no... I presume you didn't read it.
by DinkyG 11y ago
The article answers the question with a no... I presume you didn't read it.
- thomasfoster96 11y agoI didn't refer to Homo naledi in my comment, but nonetheless the article does touch on the fact that Homo erectus was a widespread species across Africa-Eurasia, but after nadeli was around.