23 ms·
I think this could be a game changer. But sadly, they might infringe on countless number of telecom patents if they introduce more than basic features (call han
by js3309 17y ago
I think this could be a game changer. But sadly, they might infringe on countless number of telecom patents if they introduce more than basic features (call handling,enhanced IVR, enhanced conferencing, and etc).
They have to walk a fine line.
- sandGorgon 17y agopatent infringement ? could you elaborate how - I mean, if a developer uses their API to create a product tailored around IVR, could it infringe? Or is it at the infrastructure level?
- js3309 17y agoI'm not sure if they infringe on the infrastructure level now because all their examples are very basic (making calls, receiving calls, forwarding calls and etc.) These have been patented and their terms have expired. I bet that's one of the reasons they only have basic examples on their site. I'm not a litigation expert but if you were to build a feature that infringes on a patent you might be liable. Below is a link to uspto telephony classifications. http://uspto.gov/web/patents/classification/uspc379/sched379.htm http://uspto.gov/web/patents/classification/uspc379/sched379...