4 ms·
Sorry, but I'm going to be "that guy", because someone is inevitably going to say "you can't patent that!", and there is generally a lot of misinformation about
by unavoidable 11y ago
Sorry, but I'm going to be "that guy", because someone is inevitably going to say "you can't patent that!", and there is generally a lot of misinformation about patents on HN. That particular document is a published patent application, and not a granted patent. You can tell on Google Patents in the field on the right that says: "Publication type: Application".
Moreover, using USPTO Pair[0], you can check the status of such patents, and it turns out that this one has been abandoned since 2011 for failure to respond to the Patent Examiner. So no, there is no patent on this (at least, not the one you pointed to).
[0] Publicly available database by USPTO: http://portal.uspto.gov/pair/PublicPair http://portal.uspto.gov/pair/PublicPair
- i000 11y agoThanks. Considering it was more of a prank from the beginning I am not surprised to see it abandoned ;)
- sciguy77 11y agoHow do you mean? Patents are generally reasonably expensive to pursue in time and money. I'm curious to hear more about the prank aspect of this patent application if you care to share.
- gregpilling 11y agoIf it has been abandoned, doesn't that mean that anybody can now use this idea? It is part of public domain knowledge now?