7 ms·
I refer you to: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1016762 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1016762 What's wrong with that as evidence for lisps superiori
by trapper 17y ago
I refer you to:
http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1016762 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1016762
What's wrong with that as evidence for lisps superiority?
- jules 17y agoWhat's wrong is that they measured the performance of Lisp programmers vs Java/C++ programmers. This is fine but you're not comparing the merits of the programming language. The Lisp programmers would win even if they were forced to program in Java.