5 ms·
Why not just i % 4?
by DatBear 11y ago
Why not just i % 4?
- novaleaf 11y agothat would alternate the suit for each card, and all the aces would be the same suit, etc.
- deleted 11y ago[deleted]
- epyjao 11y agoIf you also take the cards modulo 13 for their face, this approach works. 4 and 13 are relatively prime, so each number between 1 and 52 can be uniquely represented by the function (x) -> (x%13, x%4).
- DatBear 11y agoYes, obviously it's not a drop in replacement as the behavior is different, but it does the same thing, giving you a number from 0 to 3 based on the card number. Pairing it with i%13 works just fine.